Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Revagog ; 3(3): 80-87, Jul-Sept. 2021. ilus.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIGCSA | ID: biblio-1343841

ABSTRACT

Caminar durante el embarazo, la actividad física preferida entre las mujeres embarazadas, tiene múltiples beneficios para la salud del binomio materno - fetal en comparación con otras modalidades de actividad física. El no requerir tanto esfuerzo, la facilidad de ejecución, posibilidad de interacción social y de integrarse de manera muy significativa en algunas actividades, como los desplazamientos y las actividades ocupacionales, cuando a las embarazadas les es imposible realizar actividad física en su tiempo libre, son algunas de las ventajas que la convierten en la elegida por la mayor parte de las embarazadas. La falta de tiempo, las molestias físicas, la fatiga o la falta de energía, son algunos de los factores que impiden caminar a las gestantes. Dados los múltiples beneficios que tiene caminar para las embarazadas, las autoridades sanitarias deberían fomentar campañas de concienciación que promovieran la importancia de la práctica de actividad física por las mujeres embarazadas, entre las cuales, debería estar muy presente caminar.


Walking during pregnancy, the preferred physical activity among pregnant women, has multiple health benefits for the maternalfetal pairing compared to other forms of physical activity. Not requiring so much effort, the ease of execution, the possibility of social interaction and of integrating in a very significant way in some activities, such as travel and occupational activities, when it is impossible for pregnant women to perform physical activity in their free time, are some of the advantages that make it the one chosen by most pregnant women. Lack of time, physical discomfort, fatigue or lack of energy are some of the factors that prevent pregnant women from walking. Given the multiple benefits that walking has for pregnant women, health authorities should promote awareness campaigns that promote the importance of practicing physical activity by pregnant women, among whom walking should be very present.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Exercise , Walking , Pregnant Women , Maternal Health , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Fetal Macrosomia/prevention & control , Infant, Newborn , Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Obstetric Labor, Premature/prevention & control
2.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 41(5): 298-305, May 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1013620

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality, and its main complication is the occurrence of large for gestational age (LGA) newborns. The present study aims to characterize pregnant women with GDM and to identify factors associated with the occurrence of LGA newborns in this population. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed based on medical records of women whose prenatal care and delivery were performed at the Maternal and Child Unit of the HospitalUniversitário of theUniversidade Federal doMaranhão, state of Maranhão, Brazil.A total of 116 pregnant women diagnosed with GDMwere included according to the criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). Results The variables associated with LGA newborns after multivariate analysis were: obesity prior to pregnancy (OR = 11.6; 95% CI: 1.40-95.9), previous macrosomia (OR = 34.7; 95% CI: 4.08-295.3), high blood glucose levels in the 3rd trimester (OR = 2,67; 95% CI: 1.01-7.12) and combined change in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (fasting + postdextrose) (OR = 3.53;95%CI:1.25-14.2) = 1.17-10.6).Otherwise, insufficientweight gain during pregnancy reduced the risk for LGA newborns (OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.32). Conclusion Obesity prior to pregnancy, previous macrosomia, high blood glucose levels in the 3rd trimester, and combined change in the OGTT were independent predictive factors for LGA newborns in pregnant women with GDM.


Resumo Objetivo Diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) está associado a um maior risco de morbidade e mortalidade perinatais, e sua principal complicação é a ocorrência de recém-nascidos grandes para idade gestacional (GIG). O presente estudo visa caracterizar as gestantes com DMG e identificar fatores associados à ocorrência de recémnascidos GIG nesta população. Métodos Estudo transversal realizado a partir da coleta de dados de prontuário de mulheres cujo acompanhamento pré-natal e parto foram realizados na Unidade Materno-Infantil do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, MA, Brasil. Foram incluídas 116 gestantes diagnosticadas com DMG pelo critério do International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). Resultados As variáveis associadas à GIG após análise multivariada foram: obesidade pré-gestacional (OR= 11,6; IC 95%: 1,40-95,9), macrossomia anterior (OR = 34,7; IC 95%: 4,08-295,3), glicemia em jejum elevada no 3° trimestre (OR = 2,67; IC 95%: 1,01-7,12) e alteração combinada no teste de tolerância oral à glicose (jejum + pósdextrose) (OR= 3,53; IC 95%: 1,17-10,6). Ganho de peso inferior reduziu o risco para GIG (OR= 0,04; IC 95%: 0,01-0,32). Conclusão Obesidade anterior à gestação, macrossomia prévia, níveis elevados de glicose no sangue no 3° trimestre e alteração combinada no TOTG foram fatores preditivos independentes para os recém-nascidos GIG em gestantes com DMG.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Prenatal Diagnosis , Fetal Macrosomia/prevention & control , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Blood Glucose/analysis , Brazil/epidemiology , Medical Records , Incidence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Glucose Tolerance Test , Hospitals, University
3.
Rev. centroam. obstet. ginecol ; 14(1): 5-10, ene.-mar. 2009.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-644067

ABSTRACT

La macrosomía neonatal es la complicación más frecuente que sufre el hijo de madre diabética y su presencia se asocia con un importante aumento de la morbimortalidad perinatal. El responsable principal de su aparición es el hiperinsulinismo fetal que aparece como respuesta a la hiperglucemia fetal, la cual es consecuencia de la hiperglucemia materna. El diagnóstico prenatal de esta alteración se hace en la actualidad por medio de la ecografía fetal, la cual permite calcular el peso del feto con bastante exactitud...


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn , Diabetes Mellitus , Echocardiography , Hyperglycemia/etiology , Hyperinsulinism/complications , Fetal Macrosomia/diagnosis , Fetal Macrosomia/prevention & control , Perinatal Mortality
4.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-87004

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To find the incidence of fetal complications in Indian diabetic mothers with tight glycaemic control (TC), its comparison with other levels of glycaemic control, i.e., acceptable control (AC), uncontrolled (UC), and relevant international data. METHODS: A total of 240 mothers with diabetes mellitus (DM) and pregnancy were risk-matched and selected from the Antenatal Clinic of NRS Medical College, 176 of whom had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and 64 had pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM), and were put on exercise, diet and or insulin therapy. Glycaemic parameters monitored include fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 hr. postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG) and HbA1C. TC had - FPG < 70 mg/dl, PPPG < 100 mg/dl, HBA1C < 6.5%; AC with FPG 70-95 mg/dl, 2 hr. PPPG 100-120, HBA1C 6.5-7.5% and UC had FPG > 95 mg/ dl, 2 hr. PPPG > 120 mg/dl and HBA1C > 7.5%. Fetal parameters monitored included large-for-date babies (LGA), small-for-date babies (SFD), birth asphyxia, perinatal death, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hypocalcaemia and congenital anomalies. RESULTS: (i) LGA-AC had the best results (0% vs. 12.5 and 22.29%); (ii) SFD-TC and AC had worst results (16.7% and 18.18% vs. 0%); (iii) Birth asphyxia-AC fared worse 18.18% vs. 4.16% and 0%; (iv) perinatal death and congenital anomalies showed significant reduction with tight control (4.16% and 0% respectively); (v) Neonatal hypoglycemia is lowered in TC compared with UC while neonatal hypocalcaemia does not show any alteration. For PGDM patients there is little intra-group variability of the parameters. The UC subgroups of GDM fared better than PGDM as far as all complications and congenital anomalies were concerned. Compared with international data, there is a dichotomy of the results of GDM and PGDM. CONCLUSION: For GDM patients all parameters may not be uniformly affected by the same degree of glycaemic control. A tight control may not be theonly factor to decide on the outcomes for PGDM patients.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diet, Diabetic , Female , Fetal Development/physiology , Fetal Macrosomia/prevention & control , Fetal Monitoring , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , India , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy in Diabetics/diagnosis , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Prenatal Care , Probability , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL